#14 · ML / AI methods
Interventions probe whether biomedical model features and adaptations are causal
Across these three preprints, the dominant thread is controlled testing of what drives model behavior, rather than whether a headline metric improves. In molecular encoders, block-level interventions on Uni-Mol and MolCLR are compared against random-direction controls, showing that linear probes do not establish causal roles. SafeDelta applies a split-control criterion to decide when few-shot adaptation actually helps single-cell perturbation prediction. ECG-RSI pursues accuracy gains in ECG model question answering through verified waveform synthesis and feedback-guided interventions. The ECG item is less about causal inference than about intervention-driven improvement, so the shared thread is partial. What is new is the insistence on explicit control conditions before attributing gains or mechanisms to a model component or adaptation step.
Preprints
ECG-RSI: Recursive Self-Improvement through Targeted Electrocardiogram Waveform Evolution
ECG-RSI: recursive self-improvement framework using verified waveform synthesis and feedback-guided interventions to raise ECG model QA accuracy across seven…
Probing isn't Causality in Molecular Models
Shows linear probes do not establish causal roles: block-level interventions on molecular encoders (Uni-Mol, MolCLR) are compared against random-direction and…
A split-control criterion for few-shot adaptation in single-cell perturbation prediction
Proposes SafeDelta, a split-control criterion for deciding when few-shot adaptation helps single-cell perturbation prediction, and shows shared control…
Topic history
| Date | Rank |
|---|---|
| #14 | |
| #33 | |
| #23 | |
| #22 | |
| #38 | |
| #22 | |
| #34 | |
| #25 | |
| #21 |