#40 · Proteomics
Spatial statistics and dimension reduction resolve molecular patterns in omics data
The common thread is statistical restructuring of high-dimensional omics measurements to recover weak or spatially organised effects before testing. A spectral method maximizing Moran's I denoises spatial transcriptomics and yields a calibrated test of spatial structure, while SAKURA uses genes of interest to recover rare single-cell populations and separate similar ones. Fisher's method aggregates peptide-level p-values into protein-level statistics for target identification in chemical proteomics, and Fuzzifier* applies fuzzy categorization with consensus and path-specific features to multi-omics differential analysis. The set is heterogeneous: only two items address spatial data directly, and the others operate on peptide, multi-omics or single-cell data. What is new is the emphasis on aggregation and dimensionality reduction as the locus of improved detection, with calibrated or knowledge-guided formulations.
Published papers
A spectral dimension reduction technique that improves pattern detection in multivariate spatial data.
Introduces a spectral dimension reduction method maximizing Moran's I to denoise spatial transcriptomics data and enable a calibrated test of spatially…
SAKURA: a knowledge-guided approach to recovering important, rare signals from single-cell data.
SAKURA is a knowledge-guided dimensionality reduction framework that uses genes of interest to recover rare cell populations and separate similar…
Preprints
Peptide-to-protein data aggregation using Fisher's method improves target identification in chemical proteomics
Tests Fisher's method for combining peptide-level p-values into protein-level statistics in chemical proteomics, reporting improved target identification over…
Fuzzifier*: Robust and Sensitive Multi-omics Data Analysis
Fuzzifier* is a fuzzy-categorization pipeline for differential analysis of multi-omics data, computing consensus and path-specific features; demonstrated on…
Topic history
| Date | Rank |
|---|---|
| #40 | |
| #40 | |
| #40 | |
| #39 | |
| #33 | |
| #19 | |
| #38 | |
| #37 | |
| #23 | |
| #10 | |
| #20 | |
| #16 | |
| #3 | |
| #4 | |
| #15 | |
| #18 | |
| #6 | |
| #3 | |
| #4 | |
| #11 | |
| #1 | |
| #12 | |
| #7 | |
| #30 | |
| #24 | |
| #28 | |
| #3 | |
| #4 | |
| #12 | |
| #10 | |
| #4 | |
| #3 | |
| #15 | |
| #9 | |
| #19 | |
| #30 | |
| #20 | |
| #23 | |
| #18 | |
| #20 | |
| #12 | |
| #32 | |
| #13 | |
| #18 | |
| #30 | |
| #18 | |
| #19 | |
| #14 | |
| #22 | |
| #21 | |
| #1 | |
| #4 | |
| #2 | |
| #15 | |
| #3 | |
| #12 | |
| #19 | |
| #13 | |
| #26 | |
| #23 | |
| #5 |